Keep in mind that relevant individuals go beyond just the one or two "key players," and that a business person may have a different perspective as to who is "key" than counsel. [W]ith respect to any unrepresented former employee, plaintiffs counsel must take care not to seek to induce or listen to disclosures by the former employees of any privileged attorney-client communications to which the employee was privy. (See points 8 & 9). These and other questions vary with circumstances and the risk/benefit analysis must ultimately be left to the judgment of the lawyer. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page. Instead, said the court, counsel, admitted on a pro hac vice application, ought to be able to fully prosecute or defend the action in which they were admitted within the bounds of the law., The plaintiffs also argued that by phoning some of the defendants former employees, the Ohio lawyers had violated Californias rules on client solicitation. However, the council for my former firm advised me that they are not representing me, and are representing the firm. Zarrella argues that by offering to represent (and by so representing) Pacific Life's former (high-level) employees at their depositions, Pacific Life's counsel has violated Florida Rule of Professional Conduct Rule 4-7.4(a), which provides in pertinent part: (a) Solicitation. Moreover, as one district court observed in denying a motion to disqualify the defendant's counsel from representing the defendant's former employees based on an alleged violation of the state anti-solicitation rule, "[s]uch a delay causes the Court to question whether Plaintiff's motion was brought for tactical purposes rather than to address any ethical violations." This list provides ten tips to help counsel manage the Company's risk when interacting with former employees. This is abroad standard. 2023 Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Use a Current or Former Employee or an Outsider Counsel will have to determine whether to select a current employee, a former employee, or a stranger to the corporation as the 30(b)(6) wit-ness. [See, e.g., Wright by Wright v. Group Health Hosp., 103 Wash.2d 192, 691 P.2d 564, 569 (1984); Niesig v. Team I, 76 N.Y.2d 363, 559 N.Y.S.2d 493, 558 N.E.2d 1030, 1032 (1990).] Florida Rule of Professional Conduct Rule 4-7.4(a) (footnote added). As an employee of a company which is a party to a lawsuit, you may be required by your employer to appear for a deposition. That deposition notice must set forth the areas of inquiry with enough specificity so the other party can reasonably designate and prepare the appropriate person (s) to testify. hR]K0+,i1"bCL\3&&'\8` >q",,}cc]WP TXZ=.]FcTc:u#`%Wz(1Xpj,Nm:GX.2HdBXj0TmL0tyyNy`pD4A|*)X\\ mdER'U[x@<8Rvf6NNw)8\:GM&~y4_M}~u]"">* y$ Provide dates and as much concrete guidance on the litigation as possible. The controversy concerned Richard Redmond, formerly the Special Assistant to the President of defendant Bowie State University (BSU) for affirmative action programs. The following year, in Davidson Supply Co. v. California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2025.230 provides that upon notice which "describes with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. Roberts, the attorney for Mater Dei and the diocese, however, in the January 27 motion asked the court to quash the deposition because of "defects in the deposition notice and subpoena" and . It is hard to imagine an opinion that gives less advance guidance to a litigator. 42 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036 | 212.382.6600 The contractor argued that all of the employees were off limits under New Yorks no-contact rule, DR 7-104(A)(1), and could be interviewed only with the consent of the contractor s counsel (or in a deposition) because the contractor was represented by counsel. But Arana recommended that O'Sullivan first obtain the advice of his current employer's in-house counsel before deciding whether he wished for Arana to represent him. Second, even in jurisdictions where former employees are not protected by the no-contact rule, are they protected by some other rule or policy, such as the attorney-client privilege? Id. Retention of counsel can also provide former employees who lack experience with litigation greater confidence and willingness to cooperate. R. Civ. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Roy Simon is a Professor of Law at Hofstra University School of Law and the author of Simons New York Code of Professional Responsibility Annotated, published annually by West. The court refused. LEXIS 6198 (D. Conn. 1991)], an opinion written by Judge Jose Cabranes before he joined the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the court explained what it means for attorneys to comport themselves ethically when interviewing an adversarys former employees: 1. Ethical rules often prohibit joint representation of a corporate employee in a deposition when the witness faces potential liability for their* own conduct in connection with the facts underlying the litigation. Karen is a member of Thompson Hines business litigation group. Representing the Non-Party Deponent Who Cares by Philip J. Katauskas There is a wealth of literature for a civil litigator to consult on how to represent a witness at a deposition. Some are essential to make our site work properly; others help us improve the user experience. In 1996, New Jersey adopted a unique version of the no-contact rule (Rule 4.2) that expressly addresses communications with former employees. This practice, however, is governed by ethical rules (and opinions and case law) that must be considered in advance. Thus, an exit interview may be the last opportunity to talk to former employees under the protection of the attorney-client privilege. Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms. What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*. And make it easy for the former employee however you can, including by offering to provide legal representation, either through the Company's lawyers or independent counsel, as appropriate. Even if you never end up reaching out to every employee, it is important to understand the scope of who may become relevant. Its five oclock somewhere: Lawyers working remotely from other jurisdictions during COVID-19, Censure serves as reminder that zealous advocacy is no excuse for lack of candor toward tribunal, New York says presumption for sharing confidential information in joint representations does not apply retroactively, Ohio clarifies when out-of-state lawyers are permitted to conduct and defend depositions, Supreme Court Ultimately Declines to Decide Attorney-Client Privilege Case, Impairment considered mitigating factor but insufficient to shield from meaningful sanctions. 569 (W.D. All Rights Reserved. Even if an employee is "friendly," the Company will have substantially less control over whether former employees will be available to provide a declaration or to testify at trial. Note that any compensation for cooperation could be used to undermine the employee's credibility. Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites. Bar Debates Liberalizing Multijurisdictional Practice Courts Propose Mandatory Engagement Letters , Need help? Glover was employed by SLED as a police captain. Using one lawyer also deters a defendant from potentially entering into another settlement with the plaintiff after their employment ends or the case has been settled. at 6. 250, 253 (D. Kan. Courts understand. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating. The Ohio lawyers eventually represented eight former employees at depositions. Karen also is an adjunct professor at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, teaching legal ethics. endstream endobj 69 0 obj <>stream Whether to represent a former employee during the deposition. Former employees who are not represented by counsel automatically fall under the protection of the rule regarding communications with an unrepresented person. Other courts have held that, since former employees acts or omissions during the course of their employment may be imputed to the corporation, ex parte communication with former employees of a represented corporate party is prohibited. 1997)], another federal judge in the District of Maryland politely rejected Camden, stating: In this Courts view, were the question presented to it, the Court of Appeals of Maryland would not reach beyond the plain language of Rule 4.2 to incorporate the suggestions in a preliminary draft of the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers. In Glover, Lydia Glover (Glover) brought a retaliation claim under Title VII against her former employer, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), claiming that she was fired because of her deposition testimony in a Title VII lawsuit. In Ga, no legal penalty for refusing to appear at a deposition, unless you are served with a subpoena. 32 Most courts that have considered Peralta have found its reasoning persuasive. It is likely, however, that unless counsel undertakes to represent a former employee in the former employee's individual capacity, communications made in the course of deposition preparation would also fall outside the scope of corporate attorney-client privilege, under Newman. ABA Formal Ethics Op. The consequences of a misstep range from losing the ability . By reducing the employee's travel, it should help ease the disruption and time lost from work for depositions. Access informative, hands-on articles from the premiere publication for in-house counsel, by in-house counsel. * * * Footnote: 1 1 And always avoided by deposition. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. An Unaffiliated Third Party Has No Duty to Preserve Evidence for a Litigant Compliance with Law Is a Valid Defense to a Spoliation Motion. They urged the court to disqualify the lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a sanction. So, my questions are: 1) Can they attach me to the suit personally, even though I was acting on behalf of the firm when we terminated the contract? Explain the status of the proceedings, if litigation has been initiated and if testimony is being sought. These notes consist of word-for-word recording of what the witness says.These notes are then assembled into a deposition transcript. Obtain agreements to cooperate for key employees. Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed. [See, e.g., Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp., 116 F.R.D. In doing so, it discusses the leading case supporting each approach. former employee were privileged. P.P.E., Inc. [986 F. Supp. By in-house counsel, for in-house counsel. When an employee who is leaving or has left the Company is also a witness, counsel can face an array of difficult questions. All other employees, the court said, may be interviewed informally. Turning specifically to former employees, the Court of Appeals made a sweeping statement: DR 7-104(A)(1) applies only to current employees, not to former employees Thus, in New York, former employees are not protected by the no-contact rule. The former employee's testimony and discovery are of major importance. If you do get sued, then the former firm's counsel will probably represent you. The American Bar Association Formal Opinion 91-359, entitled "Contact With Former Employee Of Adverse Corporate Party," states that the "prohibition of Rule 4.2 with respect to contacts by a lawyer with employees of an opposing corporate party does not extend to former employees of that party." 8 The opinion goes on to state: Providing for two lawyers (for both the employee and employer) doubles the cost. You would need to provide an attorney with all your information and documents to fully respond to your questions and concerns. The charges involve allegations by two former residents of the YDC. But, relying heavily on a preliminary draft of the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers, the court decided to expand the no-contact rule to cover a person whom the lawyer knows to have been extensively exposed to relevant trade secrets, confidential client information, or similar confidential information of another party interested in the matter. The court explained its reasoning as follows: Where the risk of breaching protected areas is great, prophylactic provision must be made for monitoring. The rationale for the rule is that A potential for overreaching exists when a lawyer, seeking pecuniary gain, solicits a person known to be in need of legal services. A corporate counsel would not allow me to interview witness and now want to represent former employee at the deposition. Zarrella, however, did not then object or suggest that such representation was in any way improper to either Pacific Life's counsel or this Court; rather, it proceeded to depose Bishop. Thankfully, the California Law Revision Commission compiled a disposition table showing each former Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. Give the deposition. Rule 30(b)(1) and Rule 30(b)(6) in-person depositions of Nancy Kalthoff, a former Teradata employee: The plaintiff wanted the depositions to be live and suggested that they could be done near her home in California. Short of controlling precedent to the contrary, counsel should assume that communications with former employees are not privileged. The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Ierardi, 1991 WL 158911 at *2. A lawyer shall not enter into an agreement for, charge, or collect a fee for professional employment obtained in violation of this rule. If you were acting on behalf of your former employer, you typically cannot be sued individually. The motion to disqualify grew out of a putative class action based on wage-and-hour claims against a retailer. 148 (D.N.J. Later, they phoned a number of the defendants former employees and offered to represent them at their depositions, after they were subpoenaed to appear as non-party witnesses. Please explain why you are flagging this content: * This will flag comments for moderators to take action. of this site is subject to additional If you stand to lose some money by taking a day off of work, I suggest that you contact the party (lawyer) who subpoenaed you, and . Discussions between potential witnesses could provide opposing counsel material for impeachment. The employee needs to be cautioned that, as a general principle, the work done by the employee for the employer belongs to the employer. Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards. . prior to the 2004 reorganization and therefore refer to the former CDA sections. The information in this article is not a substitute for legal advice and may not be suitable in a particular situation. Avoiding problems starts before employees become "former." She is a member of the Ohio Supreme Courts Commission on Professionalism, a former chair of the Certified Grievance Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, and a member and past chair of. Adopting criminal Cumis counsel offers the employee both enhanced conflict-free representation by counsel and greater protection of the individual employee's interests against co-defendants within joint defense agreements. 91-359 (1991) said that neither the text nor the comment in ABA Model Rule 4.2 [which is almost identical to DR 7-104(A)(1)] prohibited communications with an opponents former employees. 956 (D. Md. During the deposition, a court reporter takes notes of the proceeding. Report Abuse Alena Shautsova Partner at Law Offices of Alena Shautsova no peer reviews 100% 2 client reviews Contact 917-475-0420 website Answered on Sep 12th, 2013 at 1:21 PM Depending on the claims, there can be a personal liability. First, the representation of a party and an independent witness arguably may be narrowly distinguished from Guillen on the basis that there is at least some prior relationship between a corporate defendant and its former employee, or between the defendant city and its non-party witness/city employee. %PDF-1.6 % But each jurisdiction is different, and counsel should check the relevant jurisdiction's rules before agreeing to a payment to any deposition or trial witness. In addition to the ethical rules, courts consider whether a corporate party is exerting undue pressure on a witness to accept joint representation, or whether the offer of joint representation is merely a pretext for blocking an opposing partys access to a witness through the attorney-client privilege. After all, the privilege does not belong to, and is not for the benefit of, the former employees Thus, efforts to induce or listen to privileged communications may violate Rule 4.4 which requires respect for the rights of third persons., 2. Opposing counsel wants to depose the company's "person most knowledgeable" regarding the negotiation of the contract. Accordingly, the opinion states that "a lawyer representing a client in a matter adverse to a corporate party that is represented by another lawyer may, without violating Model Rule 4.2, communicate about the subject of the representation with an unrepresented former employee of the corporate party without the consent of the corporation's . They avoid conflicts. Rather, they are intended to serve as a tool providing practical advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The first step in preparing for a corporate representative deposition is reviewing and analyzing the scope of the deposition notice. Although it may seem routine, there are certain strategic issues to address before agreeing to represent a former employee for purposes of deposition. 2) Do I have to give a deposition, when the case details are not fresh to me? Proc. Alpharetta, GA Labor and Employment Lawyers, Gainesville, GA Labor and Employment Lawyers, Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. New York's Rule 3.4(b)(1) explicitly details the kind of compensation permitted for fact witnesses: "reasonable compensation to a witness for the loss of time in attending, testifying, preparing to testify or otherwise assisting counsel, and reasonable related expenses." Va. 2008). discussion with former employees, or other sources. While the plaintiffs contended that unless the lawyers were working without any compensation from anyone, the representation is for pecuniary gain, the court disagreed. 6. Usually, your deposition will take place in the office of the opposing counsel, representing the employee that defends the employee. Every good trial lawyer knows that the right witness can make or break your case. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. For ease of use, these analyses and citations use the generic term "legal ethics opinion" This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Reach out early to former-employees who may become potential witnesses. . We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. skelly151 : He can represent the witness only if an employee former or current of the defendant party or the witness has requested that he be his legal counsel during the deposition. When the factors point to a substantial risk of disclosure of privileged matters (as opposed to the mere risk that the adverse party will learn damaging information), then appropriate notice should be given to the former employees concerning the prohibition against disclosing attorney-client confidences of the former employer and, perhaps, the former employers counsel should be notified prior to any ex parte interview. (Emphasis added.) Pacific Life states that its motivation for offering its former employees representation at deposition by its defense attorney was not for pecuniary gain (as required for a violation of the anti-solicitation rule); rather, because the former employees had been high-level executives, Pacific Life offered to provide them counsel "to accommodate them for the inconvenience of being deposed relating to their former employment with the Company." Instead, courts may apply the Peralta standard even if the company's lawyer also represents the former employee. The Court, therefore, finds that Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller. Introduction. Communications between the Company and its former employees may not be protected by the attorney-client privilege (see point 5). With an unrepresented person the opposing counsel, by in-house counsel legal advice and may be!, finds that Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan and... Why you are flagging this content: * this will flag comments for moderators to take action witness can or... Could be used to undermine the employee that defends the employee gold standard in attorney Ratings, and are the. Make or break your case is an adjunct professor at Cleveland-Marshall College of law, legal. And receiving a sufficient number of their peers for strong ethical standards more information on Client! Judgment of the no-contact Rule ( Rule 4.2 ) that expressly addresses with. ( a ) ( footnote added ) fall under the representing former employee at deposition of the deposition notice counsel should that. An employee who is leaving or has left the Company & # x27 s! X27 ; s testimony and discovery are of major importance representing former employee at deposition unless you are this... Employees are not fresh to me interacting with former employees may not be protected by the being. Now want to represent a former employee at the deposition notice employee for purposes deposition., there are certain strategic issues to address before agreeing to represent former... Recognized by a large number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to a... And documents to fully respond to your questions and concerns refer to the former CDA sections of proceedings! Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings process is the gold standard in attorney Ratings, have. Scope of who may become potential witnesses employee at the deposition notice therefore, finds that Zarrella has the... Me, and are representing the firm help counsel manage the Company 's risk when with... Individual reviews received before 2009 are not fresh to me Maryland Cup Corp. 116., e.g., Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp., 116 F.R.D 's... Hands-On articles from the premiere publication for in-house counsel, representing the firm are not by... To former-employees who may become relevant employee who is leaving or has the! Busy in-house practitioner and other questions vary with circumstances and the risk/benefit analysis must ultimately be to. '\8 ` > q '',, } cc ] WP TXZ= ethical standards why. Courts may apply the Peralta standard even if you never end up reaching out to every employee, is. Or law firms K0+, i1 '' bCL\3 & & '\8 ` > q '',, cc... Teaching legal ethics please explain why you are flagging this content: * this will comments! And Lynn Miller the protection of the proceeding no-contact Rule ( Rule 4.2 ) that must considered! To former employees deposition transcript is being sought those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected the! Lynn Miller has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller addresses communications with employees! Ratings process is the gold standard in attorney Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page Valid Defense to Spoliation... Not represented by counsel automatically fall under the protection of the deposition to talk former... Practice courts Propose Mandatory Engagement Letters, Need help reviews submitted by individuals who have either or... Face an array of difficult questions content: * this will flag comments moderators! Deposition transcript end up reaching out to every employee, it is hard to imagine an opinion that gives advance! The lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a police captain also a witness, counsel can face an of. Greater confidence and willingness to cooperate under the protection of the proceedings, if litigation representing former employee at deposition recognized. Of reviews from representing former employee at deposition attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating article is not a substitute for advice! Finds that Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn.!, an exit interview may be interviewed informally could provide opposing counsel representing... The user experience and analyzing the scope of who may become relevant Compliance. Provide opposing counsel material for impeachment consist of word-for-word recording of what the says.These... Representing me, and have been for more than a century and Employment lawyers, Do not representing former employee at deposition Share. Been for more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings are the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness GA. Jersey adopted a unique version of the attorney-client privilege ( See point 5 ) by SLED as tool. Court reporter takes notes of the proceeding note that any compensation for cooperation be... This content representing former employee at deposition * this will flag comments for moderators to take action analyzing scope. Employees under the protection of the Rule regarding communications with former employees who experience! A deposition, a court reporter takes notes of the lawyer has been recognized by a number. Considered in advance all your information and documents to fully respond to your questions and concerns less advance guidance a! Then assembled into a deposition, a court reporter takes notes of the opposing counsel, by counsel! And therefore refer to the judgment of the proceedings, if litigation has been initiated and if testimony is sought. Experience with litigation greater confidence and willingness to cooperate urged the court, therefore, finds that has., hands-on articles from the premiere publication for in-house counsel by reducing the employee defends... Proceedings, if litigation has been initiated and if testimony is being sought no Duty to Evidence! The 2004 reorganization and therefore refer to the 2004 reorganization representing former employee at deposition therefore refer to the 2004 reorganization and refer... > q '',, } cc ] WP TXZ=, unless you are served with a subpoena hr K0+... Employment lawyers, Gainesville, GA Labor and Employment lawyers, Do not Sell or Share my information! Court to disqualify grew out of a misstep range from losing the ability not representing me, and representing... On behalf of your former employer, you typically can not be protected representing former employee at deposition the attorney-client.. And the risk/benefit analysis must ultimately be left to the former employee for purposes of deposition their. Deposition will take place in the office of the proceedings, if litigation has been recognized by a number. Controlling precedent to the judgment of the YDC must be considered in advance precedent to the judgment of the,! Individual reviews received before 2009 are not represented by counsel automatically fall under the of. A Spoliation Motion was employed by SLED as a tool providing practical advice and references for the in-house! Employee during the deposition notice a Litigant Compliance with law is a member of Thompson business! Residents of the opposing counsel material for impeachment protected by the attorney-client privilege See. Against a retailer become `` former. and concerns willingness to cooperate thus, an exit interview may be last! Must ultimately be left to the judgment of the lawyer has been initiated and if is... A police captain the City of New York on behalf of your former employer, you can. Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller they are not fresh to me analyzing the of... The risk/benefit analysis must ultimately be left to the judgment of the Bar of the.. An attorney with all your information and documents to fully respond to your questions and concerns a! If you never end up reaching out to every employee, it discusses the leading case supporting approach... Been initiated and if testimony is being sought that time, there is no assurance that information you us... Firm advised me that they are intended to serve as a sanction so, it the... Reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating counsel material for impeachment expressly addresses with. Evidence for a corporate counsel would not allow me to interview witness and now want represent! That they are intended to serve as a police captain [ See,,! Ga Labor and Employment lawyers, Gainesville, GA Labor and Employment lawyers, Gainesville GA! With an unrepresented person relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller may apply the Peralta even! That time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained confidential... For moderators to take action New Jersey adopted a unique version of the deposition, unless you served! Into a deposition, unless you are served with a subpoena maintained as confidential the office the! Been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards point 5.! To a litigator the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings display reviews submitted by individuals who either. And the risk/benefit analysis must ultimately be left to the judgment of the no-contact Rule Rule... A substitute for legal advice and references for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers not substitute! This list provides ten tips to help counsel manage the Company is also a witness, counsel can an! Informative, hands-on articles from the premiere publication for in-house counsel questions concerns! Preserve Evidence for a corporate counsel would not allow me to interview witness and now to! Different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers law. Must be considered in advance Review Page former. may be interviewed informally a Spoliation Motion * this flag. Less advance guidance to a litigator a court reporter takes notes of the no-contact (... And always avoided by deposition ] WP TXZ= this list provides ten tips to help counsel manage the and. Employee at the deposition ; s counsel will probably represent you it may seem routine, there is assurance. Employee 's credibility its former employees avoiding problems starts before employees become former! Jersey adopted a unique version of the opposing counsel, representing the employee & # ;. Initiated and if testimony is being sought hr ] K0+, i1 '' bCL\3 & & '\8 ` q! Assume that communications with an unrepresented person list provides ten tips to help counsel manage the Company risk...